An electric field moves with the velocity that the particle had while emitting that field.

Suppose a charge q has been moving at constant speed v_{0} in the x direction for a long time. Suddenly it stops after a short period of constant deceleration. Electric field of a charge travels radially outward
and moves with the velocity that the charge had while emitting that field.

The velocity versus time graph

The electric field

Assuming that the v_{0} << c, we can neglect the relativistic compression of the field lines. Time t=0 it was the moment when deceleration began, and position x=0 it was the position of
the particle at that moment. The particle has been moved a little farther on before coming to a stop, Δx=1/2*v_{0}Δt_{1}. That distance is very small compared with the other distances in the
picture.

We now examine the electric field at a time t=Δt_{2}>>Δt_{1}. The electric field reaches a distance R=cΔt_{2}. Thus, the field at a distance greater than
R=cΔt_{2}, in region I must be a field of a charge which has been moving and is still moving at the constant speed v_{0}. That field appears to come from the point
x=v_{0}Δt_{2} on the x axis. That is where the particle would be now if it hadn't stopped. On the other hand, the field at a distance less than c(Δt_{2}-Δt_{1}), in
region II must be a field of a charge at rest close to the position x=0 (exactly at x=1/2*v_{0}Δt_{1}).

What must the field be like in the transition region, the spherical shell of thickness cΔt_{1} between region I and region II? A field line segment AB lies on a cone around the x axis which includes a certain
amount of flux from the charge q. Due to the Gauss' law, if CD makes the same angle θ with the axis, the cone on which it lies includes that same amount of flux. (Because the v_{0} << c, we can neglect the
relativistic compression of the field lines.) That's why AB and CD must be parts of the same field line, connected by a segment BC. The line segment BC shows us the direction of the filed E within the shell. This field E within the
shell has both a radial component E_{r} and a transverse component E_{θ}. From the geometry of the figure their ratio is easily found.

(1)
Due to the Gauss' law, E

_{r} must have the same value within the shell thickness that it does in region II near B. That's why

E_{r}=q/4πε_{0}R^{2}=q/4πε_{0}c^{2}Δt_{2}^{2}, and substituting this in Eq. 1 we obtain

(2)
And v

_{0}/Δt

_{1} = a, the magnitude of the (negative) acceleration, and cΔt

_{2}= R, so our result can be written

(3)
A remarkable fact is here revealed: E

_{θ} is proportional to 1/R, not to 1/R

^{2}! As time goes on and R increases, the transverse field E

_{θ} will eventually become very much stronger
than E

_{r}. Accompanying this transverse (that is, perpendicular to R) electric field will be a magnetic field of equal strength perpendicular to both R and E. This is a general property of an electromagnetic wave.

We now calculate the energy stored in the transverse electric field above, in the whole spherical shell. The energy density is

(4)
The volume of the shell is 4πR

^{2}cΔt

_{1}, and the average value of sin

^{2}θ over a sphere is 2/3. The total energy of the transverse electric field is consequently

(5)
To this we must add an equal amount for the energy stored in the transverse magnetic field:

Total energy in transverse electromagnetic field is

(6)
The radius R has canceled out. This amount of energy simply travels outward, undiminished, with speed c from the site of the deceleration. Since Δt

_{1} is the duration of the deceleration, and is also the duration
of the electromagnetic pulse a distant observer measures, we can say that the power radiated during the acceleration process was

(7)
As it is the square of the instantaneous acceleration that appears in Eq. 7, it doesn't matter whether a is positive or negative. Of course it ought not to, for stopping in one inertial frame could be starting in another. Speaking of
different frames, P

_{rad} itself turns out to be Lorentz-invariant, which is sometimes very handy. That is because P

_{rad} is energy/time, and energy transforms like time, each being the fourth component of
a four-vector. We have here a more general result than we might have expected. Equation 7 correctly gives the instantaneous rate of radiation of energy by a charged particle moving with variable acceleration-for instance, a
particle vibrating in simple harmonic motion. It applies to a wide variety of radiating systems from radio antennas to atoms and nuclei.